Showing posts with label Abramović's works. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Abramović's works. Show all posts

Ayako Kato on Marina Abramović


"Marina Abramović’s work demands extreme endurance for both herself and her audience members through the often long durational nature of her works. As seen in this reenactment of her work Seven Easy Pieces (2005), seven hours is a familiar duration for Abramović due to the normal opening hours for galleries and museums. Abramović states that audiences may not see the performance starting and ending. Other works, Relation is Movement (1977) and one of twenty-two Nightsea Crossing performances (1981 – 87), lasted 16 hours. Great Wall Walk (1988) took 90 days when Abramović and Ulay, her collaborator since 1976, walked from eastern and western opposite ends of the wall until they met and actually finished their partnership in reality.
[...]
Pain, endurance and self-flagellation are notably seen in Lips of Thomas (1975) which is included in Seven Easy Pieces, by her eating a kilogram of honey, drinking a liter of red wine, and then incising a pentagram in her stomach with broken glass. Loop and repetition often add significance in her works. In Lips and Thomas, she violently whips herself until she no longer feels any pain (Abramović 196). She explores the physical and mental limitations of the body. The elements of ancient mythology, ritual, and religion can be seen as pentagram in Lips of Thomas, and the symbol recalls The Vitruvian Manby Leonard da Vinci.

For her later work Biesenbach states, “Through the series of autobiographical works, Abramović has come to terms with her cultural, ideological, and spiritual origins in the Balkans, her family background, and the guilt and shame she felt over the genocidal atrocities in Serbia in the 1990s” (Biesenbach16). With the act of self-purification, she scrubbed skeleton in Cleaning the Mirror #1. In Balkan Baroque (1997), she sat for six hours a day for four hours to scrub, brush and scrape the meat off 6,000 pounds of blood-stained cow bones surrounded by three-channel projection of life-size images of Abramović and her parents.

Through the nude, Abramović presents herself in her art as a self-portrait, and it “manifests individuals in their most basic, reduced, pure, vulnerable state, their most equal state in relation to the rest of the world” (Biesenbach 18). With a human skeleton, she goes even further to reveal “bare bones.”

The statement below shows Abramović’s recent reflection upon duration:

I would like somehow to find a system so the performance would become life. That it actually becomes just timeless. I don’t want an audience to spend time with me looking at my work; I want them to be with me and forget about time. Open up the space and just that moment of here and now, of nothing, there is no future and there is no past. In that way, you can extend eternity. It is about being present. (Abramović 211)

Through all the essence together with the extensive duration and emergence of vulnerable, yet empowered state, Abramović’s performances reveal the different, but similar historical and personal human events in common and create reverberation in viewers’ memories and experiences through the feeling of eternity."

Abramović and Ulay at The Artist Is Present



Ulay approaches her at 2:20

Abramović hitting the psychoanalysis nail on the head over and over again


DEENAH VOLLMER: Last night you hosted a "silent" party, in which all attendees wore white headphones, white lab coats and were prohibited from speaking.

ABRAMOVIĆ: [...] Then HBO said to me, "Let's do something incredible at Sundance." My movie is about silence, about a meditative state of mind, a different state of consciousness, and what it can do. I proposed a silent party to them. They said, "This is ridiculous. Nobody will understand. People have to talk about things." And then I said, "Okay, that's fine, do any party you want." Then they said, "Do you have another idea?" And I said, "This is a good idea. We either do this, or not." And then a week before they said, "Okay, let's try." That's how this party came to be. I enjoyed myself very much. There was something warm about the situation. I could touch and hold people. It had this function of showing that communication can be on so many different levels. It doesn't need to be empty conversation, which happens most of the time at parties. Whew, this was a long answer.

VOLLMER: It was a good answer. And a great party. My mom came with me to see the premiere on Friday. She's a psychiatrist and a psychoanalyst. And she said, "I don't know what the difference is between what Marina does and what I do."

ABRAMOVIĆ: Okay, I can answer that. The only difference is context. If you learn to be a psychoanalyst, and you're working as a psychoanalyst, your job is in that context. If you're a baker, making bread, you're a baker.

Art must be beautiful; artist must be beautiful.



'Art must be Beautiful, Artist must be Beautiful' (Copenhagen, Denmark, 1975) is one of Abramovic's typical early performances. As with the 'Freeing...' series ('Freeing the Body', 'Freeing the Voice' and 'Freeing the Memory', 1976), 'Art must be Beautiful, Artist must be Beautiful' is not about physical pain, but rather about the mental state that can be reached by way of pain. In the video recording of the performance, one can see Abramovic aggressively combing her long hair. With a brush in one hand and a comb in the other, she works on her face and hair, while repeating the sentence 'art must be beautiful, artist must be beautiful'. Her voice betrays that she is in pain, and her face also makes it abundantly clear that she is hurting herself. Now and then, it seems as if she is falling into a trance. Then her voice is softer and the way she moves her brush and comb through her hair is less hard-handed. According to Abramovic, the purpose of her self-inflicted pain is to free the body and soul from the restrictions imposed by Western culture and from the fear of physical pain and death. From her perspective, performance art can be used to challenge and transgress physical and mental boundaries. In later years, she became acquainted with the Tibetan and Aboriginal cultures and with the rituals of the Sufi tribe. In the rituals of these cultures, the body is also driven to extreme physical limits, in order to enable a mental 'leap' into another dimension where physical limitations and fear no longer influence the human mind. During an interview in 1999, Abramovic said about her 1975 performance: 'A long time ago I made a piece called "Art must be Beautiful, Artist must be Beautiful". At that time, I thought that art should be disturbing rather than beautiful. But at my age now, I have started thinking that beauty is not so bad.' The video is also part of the 16-channel installation 'Video Portrait Gallery' (Abramovic 1975-2002).

Marina Abramović: Live at MoMA

A video in which Abramović talks about The Artist is Present, her performance at MoMA in 2010.

A Crash Course on Abramović


Abramović is a performance artist that’s been around for long enough to call herself the “grandmother of performance art.” When she first started out, her performances were a form of denouncement of the culture she grew up in, but she stuck with her chosen art form, and her work evolved to contain much more meaning than simple rebellion. Driven by her search for spiritual and psychological enlightenment, to find the connection and difference between the body and the mind, she has pushed her performances so far that she admits to being changed by them.
One of Abramović’s most well-known pieces is Rhythm 0. It was a performance piece performed in front of an audience, rather than recorded and displayed later, in which the audience was an active participant in the performance. Marina Abramović remained still and passive for 6 hours while the audience was invited to act upon her using any of the 72 objects that were laid out nearby—some harmless, some lethal. The audience started off interacting with Abramović timidly, but in time progressed to aggression, leaving the artist in pain and feeling violated.
This is likely one of the most powerful pieces I've ever heard of. It fascinates me, and yet scares me so much that I do not think that I would have wanted to be present during the performance. There’s so much it says about human nature, about the curiosity aspect of it. First, that a human would willingly endure such violation and humiliation for the sake of art is astounding. There was no concrete benefit to Abramović toughing it out: she was not tangibly rewarded for it, she did not do it to save her life, or to save anyone else’s life. She did it solely to push boundaries in order to satisfy her curiosity and make a statement. Then there’s the behavior of the audience to discuss—the curiosity that would cause them to begin to interact with her—a brazen, impassive, and foreboding figure—to begin with. The curiosity that would cause them to go to extremes to provoke her—to toe the boundary much the same way she was, but with potentially much more harmful results. The most powerful thing about this piece is that it brings up questions. Did the audience feel free to harm her because they dehumanized her in their minds due to her not fighting back? Or did they harm her because of a childish anger in response to her dehumanizing herself—out of frustration with not getting any validation or feedback from her? 
Another impactful piece was her collaboration with Ulay to make “AAA-AAA”, a performance piece in which the two of them speak “Aaa-” at each other for as long as they can until they need to take in more air. They progressively get louder and closer to each other, until they are yelling and screaming the same sound into each other’s mouths. Watching that single video is more exhausting than running around museums all day. It might not make your legs ache, but for anyone that is sucked into empathizing with all of the emotions and subtleties and displays of dominance in the video, it’s emotionally draining. It’s a video that speaks of things that probably should be in psychology textbooks, but isn’t. That scientific aspect, that experimentation, melded together with all the emotions it produces, is what makes it so incredible.
Interview “Marina Abramović” by Karlyn De Jong and Sarah Gold accessed through the Art Full Text database.